A social media post from former President Donald Trump has raised fresh concerns about his views on the First Amendment after he described criticism of himself as “probably illegal.” The comment was directed at late-night host Seth Meyers, who had aired a segment critiquing Trump’s recent foreign policy tour and his stance on military equipment.
The dispute centers on a technical debate about naval aviation. While speaking to service members in Japan, Trump lamented the military’s shift from steam catapults to electric ones on aircraft carriers. Meyers used his comedy show to explain that the new electromagnetic system is more efficient and cost-effective, mockingly suggesting Trump’s preference was based on aesthetics rather than practicality.
Trump’s lengthy rebuttal on Truth Social attacked Meyers personally, calling him “the WORST to perform” on television and a “deranged lunatic.” However, the post’s conclusion is what alarmed legal experts and political commentators. By framing Meyers’ anti-Trump commentary as potentially unlawful, the former president appeared to challenge a cornerstone of American democracy: the right to criticize elected officials and public figures.
The online reaction was immediate, with users across social media platforms highlighting the constitutional protection of free speech. One individual responded, “Still struggling with the first amendment I see,” while another quipped, “You can’t go against a dictator. It is 100% illegal.” The incident underscores the ongoing tension between Trump and the media, and fuels the debate over the limits of political discourse.
